The abrupt exit of Indian-American billionaire Vivek Ramaswamy from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has raised questions about the factors leading to his ouster. Was it his controversial tweet about H-1B visas and American mediocrity, his Hindu faith, or deeper political struggles involving tech magnate Elon Musk? The incident shines a spotlight on political ambition, cultural identity, and the challenges of fitting into a movement grappling with its inclusivity.
Poll
Do You Agree with Vivek Ramaswamy’s Comments on H-1B Visa Holders?
The H-1B Tweet Controversy
Ramaswamy ignited a firestorm in December with a tweet criticizing what he described as America’s “cultural veneration of mediocrity.” In his post, he argued that the US had deprioritized academic excellence in favor of social conformity, tracing this trend back to cultural shifts in the 1990s. He suggested this cultural failing—not an innate IQ gap—was why top tech companies often hired foreign-born engineers over native-born Americans.
He used examples from pop culture, pointing to the glorification of prom queens and star athletes over valedictorians and science champions as indicative of a society celebrating “normalcy” over intellectual achievement. Immigrant families, he argued, placed a higher premium on academic excellence, which accounted for their dominance in STEM fields.
Ramaswamy called for a “cultural reset,” urging America to refocus on intellectual pursuits and academic competition while cautioning that the nation risked losing its edge to countries like China. While some praised his comments as a much-needed wake-up call, others accused him of elitism and undermining American workers by advocating for high-skilled immigration reforms.
This polarizing tweet placed Ramaswamy in the crosshairs of MAGA’s anti-immigration faction, compounding existing frustrations within Trump’s team.
Denials and Allegations
The situation escalated when National File published an article claiming that Ramaswamy had linked his departure from DOGE to backlash over his tweet. The report, attributed to journalist Patrick Howley, quoted Ramaswamy allegedly confirming that his tweet was a factor in his exit. “Obviously,” he was reported to have said.
Ramaswamy vehemently denied the claims, calling the allegations “lies” in a post on X (formerly Twitter). “Dude, I have no idea who you are, never got a text from you, and would never reply if I did,” he wrote. Reacting to the ongoing speculation, he doubled down: “Lies. Never spoke to these clowns.”
Despite his denials, rumors persisted that the tweet was the final straw for Ramaswamy’s position at DOGE. While his remarks alone may not have been enough to force his departure, insiders suggest they exacerbated tensions with Elon Musk, who played a pivotal role in his removal.
Elon Musk’s Role in the Shakeup
Elon Musk’s growing influence within DOGE—and the broader Trump administration—has been a contentious subject. As co-chair of DOGE, Musk is seen as the driving force behind its agenda, frequently clashing with Washington’s bureaucratic norms. According to sources, Musk grew increasingly frustrated with Ramaswamy’s attempt to balance his role at DOGE with a gubernatorial campaign in Ohio.
“Musk has an iron grip on DOGE,” a Republican strategist told Politico. “And when he decided Ramaswamy wasn’t a fit, it was only a matter of time.”
Reports indicate Musk viewed Ramaswamy’s dual ambitions as a distraction from DOGE’s mission. “You can’t have one foot in DOGE and the other in politics,” one insider quoted Musk as saying. The tweet criticizing America’s mediocrity only amplified these frustrations, making it easier for Musk to push Ramaswamy out.
Ironically, Musk himself has courted controversy, including agreeing with a X user who called Trump supporters “r****” in a tweet. Despite this, his position within DOGE remains unchallenged, further highlighting his unparalleled influence.
DOGE’s Ambitious Goals
DOGE was launched as a cornerstone of Trump’s second-term agenda, tasked with streamlining government and cutting federal bureaucracy. Its ambitious goals included eliminating entire agencies, modernizing federal technology, and reducing federal jobs by 75%—a plan Trump claimed could save $2 trillion. Musk, however, recently revised expectations, admitting that even $1 trillion in savings might be optimistic.
Ramaswamy, known for his business acumen and conservative principles, was initially seen as a key figure in achieving these goals. However, his polarizing views and blunt communication style quickly alienated members of Trump’s inner circle.
“They wanted him out before the tweet—but kicked him to the curb when that came out,” a source told Politico. Ramaswamy’s December post was viewed as the tipping point, compounding Musk’s frustrations and sealing his fate.
The Role of Race and Faith
Ramaswamy’s ouster also highlights the challenges Indian-Americans face within MAGA’s nativist factions. Despite their alignment with conservative ideals such as free markets and innovation, figures like Ramaswamy remain outsiders in a movement that often views multiculturalism as a threat. Ramaswamy has often found himself defending his own faith amongst MAGA adherents.
The experience of Usha Vance, the Hindu wife of Vice President JD Vance, illustrates this tension. During Vance’s inauguration, Usha’s presence drew both admiration and crude attacks from MAGA’s fringes. Comments like “Christ is King, not some stinky Indian idol” reveal the discomfort many within the movement feel toward non-Christian identities.
Ramaswamy’s unapologetic Hinduism has also drawn criticism. His references to the Bhagavad Gita are viewed by some evangelicals as antithetical to MAGA’s Christian nationalist ethos. As one commentator put it, “Ramaswamy is the perfect candidate on paper, but his Hinduism keeps him at arm’s length.”
Prominent Indian-Americans in MAGA
Ramaswamy is not alone in navigating MAGA’s complicated relationship with Indian-Americans. Other prominent figures include:
• Kash Patel, who became a hero within MAGA for his role in battling the “deep state” but remains a polarizing figure.
• Dr Jay Bhattacharya, the Stanford professor who opposed COVID-19 lockdowns and emerged as a leading voice in MAGA’s pandemic skepticism.
• Sriram Krishnan, tapped by Trump to advise on artificial intelligence but criticized for supporting immigration reforms that MAGA’s nativists oppose.
While these figures symbolize MAGA’s strategic embrace of diversity, their presence often sparks backlash among the movement’s more nativist wings.
A Cultural and Political Crossroads
Ramaswamy’s departure from DOGE reflects broader challenges facing Trump’s administration. While DOGE’s goals are ambitious, its lack of formal authority and mounting legal challenges raise questions about its viability. Critics argue that the initiative may amount to little more than political theater.
For Ramaswamy, the fallout from his ouster complicates his political aspirations. As he pivots to a gubernatorial run in Ohio, he must contend with perceptions of being sidelined by Musk and suspicions about his commitment to MAGA’s America First agenda.
Musk’s influence, meanwhile, continues to grow. While some view him as a visionary capable of transforming government, others warn of the risks of concentrating so much power in a single tech billionaire. Musk’s dominance over DOGE, coupled with Trump’s reliance on him, raises concerns about a “tech oligarchy” shaping US policy.